Skip to main content


If you want to onboard friends and family to the Fediverse, https://jointhefediverse.net is an amazing tool.

Made by @stefan, this site explains -- in easy-to-understand words -- what the Fediverse is, how it works, and what to try.

This is a must for everyone who wants to tell the world about the Fediverse!

@fediversenews

in reply to Chris Trottier

Thanks for the link to https://jointhefediverse.net.

It is an amazingly attractive quick introduction to the Fediverse and it guides people to open Fediverse alternatives for the closed platforms that they are currently used to.

in reply to Paul Schoe

How many people remember the 90's? Back before corporate controll? I do and I remember being able connect a jabber server to a Yahoo chat service to a Google chat service to facebook chat to twitter ....

Before corporations decide to rule the world...

Mastodon is what the internet once was 🤣

in reply to Occupy Journey 🐧🇺🇲♒🌎

* "The Fediverse is what the internet once was"

Honestly, if new users were given those five options for "Twitter-like" services, with a proper pro's/con's list of each of their features along with the information that they all can talk to each other seamlessly regardless of which one they pick, I don't think many would voluntarily pick Mastodon.

@paulschoe @atomicpoet @stefan @fediversenews

in reply to m@thias.hellqui.st :verified-skull:

Out of curiosity, which do you think people would be more drawn to?

I don't have a specific favorite, I'm just curious what people think most new users would pick if they had to pick on features alone.

Like in my case, I like Mastodon, but I'm really open to trying anything at this point.

in reply to Alexander K.

Unfortunately, I do not believe that people chose on features.
People choose on 3 items:
1) Hype
2) Recommendations.
3) Ease of signing up

Based on hype, I expect that BlueSky will get the largest initial growth. That despite the fact that Jack Dorsey has even said that he likes to replace 'likes' by financial endorsements (mini payments), which he calls: real commitment. This clearly shows what a wolf in sheep's clothes BlueSky is.

in reply to Unatributed 👤 ☑

Ah, another interesting distinction! That's true so far in my experience.

One largely disseminates information from whichever person happens to have a microphone at any given moment in time to people who absorb and react to information, whereas the other is people trading or sharing information amongst themselves as a peer group.

in reply to Alexander K.

Yes, the idea of the media (newspapers, television, movies. etc.) is typically uni-directional.

However, a network is typically multi-directional... There maybe nodes or branches in the pathway, but even the lowest leaf can communicate with along any path of the tree efficiently.

There are quite a few analegies that can be used for thiese types of structures.

@Alexx9811@mastodon.social@atomicpoet@mastodon.social@stefan@stefanbohacek.online@m@thias.hellqui.st@mahaska@kolektiva.social@paulschoe@mastodon.world@mnemonicoverload@libranet.de@fediversenews@venera.social

in reply to Paul Schoe

Jack is pushing nostr to do this too by the way.

I think this is a big mistake. What made FB and Twitter and Youtube cool once upon a time was that they didnt run on advertisements or charge anything.

Once they started doing that, things went downhill. I feel like this is going to turn individuals into advertisers.

Im trying to be very vocal about my opinion on this. But I dont want to come off as rude. So forgive anything that might sound harsh.

in reply to :twiz:

@fediversenewsJack Dorsey is a crackpot. Any social network that shifts its incentives from communications to financial transactions will fail.
in reply to eris

@fediversenews(I don’t think algorithms are that bad though, it’s useful for making new frens on Twitter.)
in reply to eris

There are lots of opinions about algorithms. I might be convinced to try something minimal and open source. Say to maybe weed out spam/bots. But buy-in-large I am going to stay away from anything that rewards users for engagement.

I think that has proven to be unhealthy. IMO

Fediverse News reshared this.

in reply to :twiz:

I find that filters (as mastodon has) as well as the occasional block/mute/disable boosts from user is more than enough for me right now to remove any spam... I used to use reddit a lot around when I joined fedi and when I started using fedi seriously it was quite surprising to see how little I actually needed any "omniscient algorithm" to control what content I saw
in reply to Skyler

I :100a: agree with this. Curating your own feed is not that difficult. We have the tools. We have the network. We do not need an algo.

That lie is perpetuated by the algorithm people just trying to get you to buy more algorithm.

Fediverse News reshared this.

in reply to :twiz:

@fediversenewsThe Twitter algorithm is not perfect, but it works and they’ve already open sourced part of it. Just a matter of time before someone experiments with it here, let alone whatever Blue Sky tries.

Idrc as long as there are options that don’t suck. It seems like there will probably always be instances somewhere that keep a classical, chronological feed, just because a lot of people hate algorithms.

in reply to eris

The twitter algorithm is not minimal. And it is not sustainable unless you have a team of people nurturing it.

I personally will probably continue to not trust computers to tell me what I should focus on.

I am willing to be persuaded differently but almost every algorithm Ive used has been one that I wished I didnt have to use.

Fediverse News reshared this.

in reply to :twiz:

@mahaska @Alexx9811 @atomicpoet @paulschoe @stefan @m @fediversenewsIf I had to guess, just from surface level, the main thing that Twitter is doing manually is creating topical categories, which are not very useful. They’re mostly for promoting celebrities.

What is useful are the posts it promotes from people your follows follow, and important posts from people you follow. It’s much easier to find new people through that than it is on sites without it.

in reply to Alexander K.

2/2
Based on Ease of signing up, Mastodon comes clearly behind those centralised solutions even though decentralised is what I think people really want.

That means that I put my faith in recommendations. Unfortunately, most of these only occur once people have been burned by choosing based n Hype or on Ease of signing up.

in reply to Paul Schoe

That makes sense. I'm kind of interested in Calckey as it looks like it might have some things that look pretty cool.

I think it ultimately comes back to what's been said before, the reason Twitter and such are so popular is the plug and play nature of it.

One signs up and they can follow their friends and in cases like Twitter, celebrities and whatnot. Until that's easier anywhere else, I see Bluesky being the most popular.

in reply to Alexander K.

I believe that in order to improve the onboarding UX, fediverse apps should not be more complicated than Bluesky. We need to empathize more at the app client level and prioritize safe defaults for new users to learn the ropes with the app, even if it means risking the preferences of long-time users
in reply to Jesus Cova

It is not that difficult to streamline the onboarding process of the Fediverse.

Making one central port of access while allowing individual instances to participate in that or not (many won't, and that is no problem).

But this requires an investment at the top and at this moment, the funding for that is simply not available.

To get it done, crowdfunding is required as there is no clear path to ROI for commercial investors.

in reply to m@thias.hellqui.st :verified-skull:

I’m trying different combinations. I have a bunch of computers, but the screens are full of work stuff, so I don’t really use them for social media. I use mobile.
I’ve got CalcKey/Kimis, Friendica/Relatica and Mastodon/Ice Cubes

So far the Mastodon/Ice Cubes combo is the fastest and most generally useful, but I’m annoyed I’m missing out on long posts when I want them, and not seeing/sending emoji reactions.

in reply to Kevin Davidson

Yeah, ok. But if you were me you would be annoyed by the fact you are not truly, actually, seeing all the replies from others in the threads you participate in, simply because it isn't technically possible in your chosen platform.

There is no actual reason it should be like that. It is just how it is, in your chosen platform. I couldn't take that. So I swapped for to a service that does it right. Thankfully, @MonaApp plays nicely with Akkoma, which in all honesty they all should do as Akkoma (and Pleroma) are using the Mastodon API, which means I have a good/nice app to interact with too, something that should be incentivised, whereas Ice Cubes and Ivory should be told off for not doing it right. Only then would they change.

in reply to m@thias.hellqui.st :verified-skull:

Ice Cubes fetches all the replies. It’s been a long time since I used the Mastodon web interface as it annoyed me too much, and that was definitely one thing that I felt was broken, along with the absence of threading (I see that’s coming in the next update). It would be nice if Ice Cubes supported some of the other platforms.
I was using Mona with Friendica, but it was a bit odd. I’m hoping Relatica will more closely match the native UI.
in reply to m@thias.hellqui.st :verified-skull:

I should probably sign up on an Akkoma instance somewhere and try Akkoma/Mona. I don’t have enough Fediverse accounts yet…
Unknown parent

Alexander K.

Thank you for that. It's cool to hear people's thoughts.

I am naturally curious about tech, but often my reach exceeds my grasp in terms of understanding everything. I feel like I know more than a casual social media user, but I'm definitely not as well versed as many people on here who really get this stuff at a level I don't.

in reply to Chris Trottier

Hi. Don't mind me. I appreciate your contributions in making the FediVerse that much better.

I'm just responding to a need to express myself in a manner consistent with my being, so you should probably just ignore the next paragraph.

"ONBOARD" IS NOT A VERB!!!! "ONBOARD" IS NOT EVEN AN ENGLISH WORD!! "ON BOARD" IS A PREPOSITIONAL ADJECTIVE PHRASE THAT DOES NOT TAKE A DIRECT OBJECT!

Okay, all done. We now return to our regular programming.

@stefan @fediversenews

#GrammarNazi

in reply to Potung Thul

Bit off topic, and probably best in a language group (are there any? There should be), but it’s too late. It’s well established that all nouns can be verbed. And now prepositional adjective phrases can be nouned.
You will probably be unhappy if you learnt the etymology of many words that were imported, misheard, butchered, re-engineered with local grammar and set loose to breed more words.
in reply to Kevin Davidson

I am unhappy about the unnecessary ambiguity caused by ignoring grammar of the parts of speech. For example, the word hammer can be verb or noun, but if you take the verb, and convert that to a noun, you could mean the action of hammering, or the actual tool the hammer itself. In this case, "on board" as a verb may mean to be on board, or the action of becoming on board. Ambiguity, all because we were too lazy to say "bring on board".

#grammar
@atomicpoet @stefan @fediversenews

in reply to Potung Thul

Please do not check the definitions of cleave, sanction or bi-weekly. I have given up throwing my hands in the air when Americans say they want to “table something” at a meeting and promptly remove it from the agenda instead of correctly *adding* it.
Words are made of amorphous goo and fighting it will end in tears.
in reply to Kevin Davidson

You are absolutely right. I protest only because it is my nature to balk against creating even more ambiguity where previously language meant something.

Eventually language will degenerate into a single word that will mean anything of which we happen to be thinking at the moment:
"smurf!"

@atomicpoet @stefan @fediversenews
#English

in reply to Potung Thul

If you’re interested you could join the campaign against “I could care less”. Canute, Sisyphus and the little boy with his finger in the dyke have all said they’d lend a hand just as soon as they’ve finished the thing they’re in the middle of just now. With all this support, I’m confident about this one.
in reply to Kevin Davidson

I know it seems hopeless. Still, it's the principle of the thing, not to take the rest way out. That's why I am here and not on the bird site.

@atomicpoet @stefan @fediversenews

in reply to Potung Thul

@Potung Thul, @Kevin Davidson, the increasing popularity of the ignorant leads to the death of the proper meaning of words. I love to verbinate words or add some silly adjectivication to them. I do so purely for the comedic affect, it's fun to play with words. Luckily I'm not admired by many and therefor have very little influence over the way people speak. 😁

Fediverse News reshared this.

in reply to eshep

I have no problem with people adjectivicationalising words.
in reply to eshep

Suffixes help label the part of speech of a word, so I have no problem with getting an invitation, just an invite.
There will always be lazy people in the world, and there will always be a place for those who show how it's supposed to be done.

@MetalSamurai @atomicpoet @stefan @fediversenews

#GrammarNazi
#PartsOfSpeech

Unknown parent

Trenton Matthews
@fediversenews Adding to that, it needs communities in general!
And #Mastodon isn’t meant for communities, it’s for posting.
How do ya get more people to embrace #Fediverse community platforms such as #Friendica and #Hubzilla?
Unknown parent

great eepe :flag:
what are the prizes for winning and what we are competing at?
Unknown parent

eris
@feldNo, it doesn’t. Nostr is one big hugbox and it sucks because they’re too unified on Bitcoin worship. AT is still far behind both and it’s been 3.5 years since they started.
@feld
Unknown parent

Kevin Davidson
It would be nice if the different platforms all agreed on things. Good for end users, if there were a wider range of mobile clients that all just worked with whichever platform you chose. I wonder if it would slow down the diversity of new or experimental features.
Also, turns out bikeshed.party is blocked by my Mastodon instance, but I realised I was missing some replies.
in reply to Trenton Matthews

in reply to Trenton Matthews

@Trenton Matthews, I've seen a decent approach being used by folks creating guppe groups to unify their conversations. I don't know that discoverability of these groups is as easy as the creation of them though. Seems like it'd be quite easy to wind up with groupname, group-name, and group_name, all having the same conversations.
in reply to eshep

@eshep @Trenton Matthews Guppe seems to me like a dirty hack by someone who wanted to introduce groups/forums to Mastodon but didn't know at that point that more powerful solutions already existed (Friendica, Hubzilla, (streams)).

Group discoverability on Guppe is hit-and-miss. It depends on how popular your group is, for Guppe only lists 50 groups whereas Friendica lists all of its forums.

in reply to Jupiter Rowland

@Jupiter Rowland, yes, a very hacky solution, and yes, I know proper forum-like implementations exist in Friendica, they're fantastic! Equally great is Lemmy being presented in Friendica as a forum. However, being that none of those have a very wide scope of discoverability, it's virtually impossible for a common Mastodon user to find one, much less know about them to begin with. It also wouldn't surprise me to see Guppe preferred over it because other platforms are seen as ""rivals"" or ""clones"" of Mastodon, and Guppe seen as something internal to it because that's how it's been presented to them.

If only there were a way for folks to see what features exist on each platform before committing to one. Simply telling folks this≈that helps but just isn't quite enough. Nor does the "just join here cause it's what I use"' approach.

And hacky as it may be, I'm happy to see folks wanting a bit stricter conversation control have found a way to do so across the fediverse. It helps those looking for a more intimate atmosphere to find a home here.

in reply to eshep

in reply to Trenton Matthews

Friendica has super weird and counterintuitive user onboarding. And I'm a veteran Fediverse user. I would never send a new user there.

I never tried Hubzilla though. Maybe I should.

in reply to Jupiter Rowland

I count myself as one of the lucky ones. Having come from diaspora looking for a bit more in the features department, I did a fair bit'a shoppin round before settlin on Friendica, then a bit more before finally choosin who ran it.
in reply to Jupiter Rowland

“Seriously, I wouldn't wonder if many of those who have added FediverseNews think it's on Mastodon.” And those who do know - why would we care? Since it’s set up as a public federating group, I can interact with it trivially on Mastodon or pop over to Friendica for a different user interface. Not sure how the membership & moderation work though - if I were a problem, does the group just ignore me? Does that carry to mstdn?
in reply to Bruce G_NS

@Bruce G_NS Those who know aren't part of the problem.

It's those who are fully convinced that the Fediverse is only Mastodon and who may go haywire when you tell them that they are already using a non-Mastodon Fediverse project by being connected to Fediverse News.

in reply to Jupiter Rowland

I think it's a hack who wanted to introduce groups to Mastodon users. Because Friendica and Lemmy and Hubzilla and whatever aren't where the people are.

And telling the people that those features they're looking for exist over there hasn't been a super effective strategy.

in reply to Jupiter Rowland

Respectfully, sir, does it make a difference? If what I’m seeing on my Mastodon feed works for me, but there’s a better interface for some activity (pixelfed, for example), but I can still see it on Mastodon even if I can’t thumbs up/down it, and reply, I think the distinction is moot. This is sounding more and more like the neverending “which email tool to use on my phone” in our house. Different UIs enabling different features
in reply to Bruce G_NS

in reply to Christopher

in reply to Jupiter Rowland

Yeah, that's why I said that telling them hasn't been a super effective strategy. I've been blue in the face for five months now excitedly informing users that things they want are right there, if they just take a step in that direction.

It's clearly not how people want to come to the information. They don't need to be told or shown from strangers they encounter in a new land. They need to find it through some other channels.

in reply to Jupiter Rowland

OK so you’re talking with one of the batshit crazy types (also, see straw man argument). Still comes down to as a mastodon user (this hat) I can interact with the forum using my current tools. If I discover that I want different features, I can move to a different hat. Most users don’t care about the back end plumbing, and the technical argument that “this is better” doesn’t fly. What’s easy to use for *me*? Upsell for stuff I don’t know if I need fails.
in reply to Bruce G_NS

@Bruce G_NS To you, it doesn't matter. I've understood that long ago.

Still, there are people who go completely and utterly stark raving bat-shit insane over there being something else in their nice and cosy Fediverse than nice and cosy Mastodon.

Luckily, you are none of these people. Also, you know that the Fediverse is more than Mastodon. And you acknowledge that.

in reply to Christopher

in reply to Bruce G_NS

@Bruce G_NS, @Jupiter Rowland, the fact that some tools are objectively ""better"" than others only makes a difference to the user who wants that betteryness. The best thing about the Fediverse is that choice we all have to use the interface that suits our needs, be it an interface that already exists or one that has yet to be realized.

The part of this that's a problem is when new folks join Mastadon, find the interface doesn't work for them, and when they ask for assistance or clarification, they're told "that's just the way it is" instead of "here's a few other ways you could enjoy the Fediverse". Simply because the person they asked only knows the word Mastadon and has no idea what a fediverse is. The root of it all is the Fediverse being advertised as Mastadon instead of Mastadon being advertised as a way to interact with people in the Fediverse.

Fediverse News reshared this.

in reply to Christopher

@kichae@kitchenparty.online, @Jupiter Rowland, where the people are is the #fediverse, not #Mastadon. Yes, the mass of fediverse users may be using Mastadon but the entire point of it speaking #ActivityPub is interoperability with other AP things. Thereby making #Friendica's forums, or #Lemmy's forums/threads(?), or #rss feeds, or #PeerTube channels or #Pixelfed albums(?), or #Funkwhale stations(?), or #Guppe groups, or whatever else, all easily accessible to everyone in the fediverse if people are simply given the proper information from the start.

Fediverse News reshared this.

in reply to Chris Trottier

Not a UX expert but that looks umm, insane to me.

Every single service is a new and often weird word, so that’s not plain language.
Example: People care about their Twitter network, which of the five weird names should they choose to replicate Twitter? There’s no indication. Not to mention none are all that similar to Twitter user base, which leads to disappointment.

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to Kynyc

The only place that has a userbase similar to Twitter is Twitter.
in reply to Chris Trottier

So why is there a statement like if you like Twitter try one of these 5 random services. Like I said it’s setting up a new user for an expectation that is almost 100% going to end in disappointment.
in reply to Kynyc

They’re speaking in terms of function, not community.
in reply to Chris Trottier

I don’t know if you’re arguing just to argue but I’m just at my patience limit.
This newbie explainer is implying EVERYONE is reachable on the fediverse, that it’s universal like email.
in reply to Kynyc

Well, yes, that’s true. The interfaces are different but they all talk to each other like email.
in reply to Chris Trottier

Comparing by function and comparing by community are both useful. Without explaining the distinction, the site as is may make more sense to a technical audience than a general audience.
in reply to John Abbe (aka Slow)

It's impossible to say, "This is what this service's community is like" because the reality of federation is that each server hosts a different community.
in reply to Chris Trottier

"the reality of federation is that each server hosts a different community"

Any intro to mastodon or fediverse which didn't communicate this would be incomplete, no? (Unless you, say, recommend and assume the community of mastodon.social and similarly-run big servers if you're talking about Mastodon.)

in reply to John Abbe (aka Slow)

Have you seen this very interesting and informative #Fediverse introduction site for #newbies?

https://mastodon.social/@HistoPol/110287650704584341

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to HistoPol (#HP)

That was the website that started the thread. (Scroll all the way up.)