-----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY-----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-----END PUBLIC KEY-----
2024-04-14T20:19:45+00:00
- About:
#Manifestation. #Spirituality.
Working with #IT.
Originally from #Denmark, living in #Hungary.
Github: https://github.com/andersrh
- Uid
-
4c906314-5063-d036-5507-ca5970542118
- Nickname
-
anders
- Full_name
-
Anders Rytter Hansen
- Searchable
-
true
- First_name
-
Anders
- Family_name
-
Rytter Hansen
- Url
-
https://rytter.me/
- Photo
-
- Photo_medium
-
- Photo_small
-
Anders Rytter Hansen
in reply to Anders Rytter Hansen • •like this
frippa and Joe Bidet like this.
Joe Bidet doesn't like this.
Memes reshared this.
Joe Bidet
in reply to Anders Rytter Hansen • • •go figure...
like this
Soviet Snake and Arthur Besse like this.
don't like this
Anders Rytter Hansen, grin and SourPickle don't like this.
Memes reshared this.
Anders Rytter Hansen
in reply to Joe Bidet • •grin likes this.
Arthur Besse doesn't like this.
Memes reshared this.
Joe Bidet
in reply to Anders Rytter Hansen • • •like this
Soviet Snake and Arthur Besse like this.
grin doesn't like this.
Memes reshared this.
Anders Rytter Hansen
in reply to Joe Bidet • •I am happy for you then 😃
@Joe Bidet
grin likes this.
Memes reshared this.
Joe Bidet
in reply to Anders Rytter Hansen • • •can I just ask this: do you see or not a racist undertone to this image? (i am not trying to entrap or judge your or anything, it's just curiosity)
Arthur Besse likes this.
Memes reshared this.
Anders Rytter Hansen
in reply to Joe Bidet • •No I don't see it and neither is it my intention to make anything racist out of it. I don't have any problems with people who are another race than I am - rather the opposite, I think other cultures are very interesting.
I just see it as a funny coincidence that there are 3 different races and if you rotate once to the right, it will be the same race/color together. It's just coincidence and that's what makes it funny. Not some evil intention behind it :) and then it's funny that someone sees it and makes a meme out of it.
like this
grin and Cătă like this.
Memes reshared this.
Joe Bidet
in reply to Anders Rytter Hansen • • •Yet, the very notion that there would be "races" here is err.. a very definition of "racism" (ie. who sees things according to supposed "races")... there is one race, the Human kind... the rest is physical differences.
So somehow, inevitably, making jokes based on these physical differences, on sorting people (even jokingly) according to them (especially implying that there would be a "good" configuration for the, and another that would remind a state that everyone has experience, the last step of a cube where "omg omg i am almost there!!!" feeling so good as something that inevitably needs fixing...) is further re-inforcing discriminatory mechanisms.
Imagine that you would see an image that would make you say "there are 4 skinnies and 4 fatties on that (virtual) picture" -> if your conception of the world, if your way of looking at things is to see "skinnies" on one side, and "fatties" on the other, if you call them that and sort them accor... show more
Yet, the very notion that there would be "races" here is err.. a very definition of "racism" (ie. who sees things according to supposed "races")... there is one race, the Human kind... the rest is physical differences.
So somehow, inevitably, making jokes based on these physical differences, on sorting people (even jokingly) according to them (especially implying that there would be a "good" configuration for the, and another that would remind a state that everyone has experience, the last step of a cube where "omg omg i am almost there!!!" feeling so good as something that inevitably needs fixing...) is further re-inforcing discriminatory mechanisms.
Imagine that you would see an image that would make you say "there are 4 skinnies and 4 fatties on that (virtual) picture" -> if your conception of the world, if your way of looking at things is to see "skinnies" on one side, and "fatties" on the other, if you call them that and sort them according to that, well it's a discrimination based on physicail aspects.. isn't it?
whether it bears a name ("fatism"?) or not doesnt matter so much as how it is a way of looking at people and at the world, that in turns can bring about further simplifications, de-humanization (if someone is "a fatty" or "a xxxx" they often are less than just "a person"), discriminations, and as history showed, often violence...
Does it make any sense to you?
Anders Rytter Hansen doesn't like this.
Anders Rytter Hansen
in reply to Joe Bidet • •I can understand your point of view, that you feel it can escalate to something worse. I'm not gonna argue with your point of view. None of us will change our opinions so it'll be wasted energy anyways :)
Memes reshared this.
Joe Bidet
in reply to Anders Rytter Hansen • • •My opinion here is not that "it can escalate to something worse", but rather that it is parf of something already bad, very present and casually ingrained in many people's head, that needs careful attention to not casually reproduce...
somehow it is already "worse". ie. everybody born in a racist society, who is not born as an object of this racism is bound to be at least partly racist themselves, and/or part of that problem by being complacent and/or pretending that there is no problem at all... it should not be shameful to acknowledge that, as long as people are in good faith and open to introspection.
Also it takes anyone a while to see such things when they are very much used to it.. To look back and say "oops, yeah maybe that was a mistake" in retrospect is part of it.. I am not saying you should, it's just how it happened to me.
Arthur Besse likes this.
Memes reshared this.
grin
in reply to Joe Bidet • • •A lot of Social Justice Fighters actually create a non-existent problem and then fight against it. In my opinion it is not racism to show people, with red hair, black skin, large eyes, short hand, small nose or whatever. If someone looks at these people and see only racism then it may be well possible that the racism is not on the picture but in the head of the said observer.
In my opinion racism is when someone suggest bad things about a group of people (preferably minority group, according to the internet warriors). I do not see racism when there is no negative feelings involved, just by showing, pointing out or joking about any differences.
Some people became way oversensitive, and often for "some imagined others", not even for themselves. It is sad and disturbing, since it became just another opportunity to raise the stress level claiming preceived problems with others.
like this
Anders Rytter Hansen and Cătă like this.
Memes reshared this.
Ephera
in reply to grin • • •Nah, that doesn't follow from that. The definition of "racist" can be that racists believe in humanity consisting out of different races. Like how theists believe in the existence of one or more gods, even though we don't have scientific evidence for that either. And therefore a racist joke can be a joke which implies that existence of multiple human races.
I agree that it's not racism to recognize the physical appearance of people. But we all have racism in our head. We all have prejudices, because we all have pattern-recognizing brains. The goal is simply to not succumb to these most basic thoughts, but make rational judgements instead.
I agree with the rest of your comment. The truly problematic aspect of racism is institutional racism. Where whole structures in society disadvantage cert... show more
Nah, that doesn't follow from that. The definition of "racist" can be that racists believe in humanity consisting out of different races. Like how theists believe in the existence of one or more gods, even though we don't have scientific evidence for that either. And therefore a racist joke can be a joke which implies that existence of multiple human races.
I agree that it's not racism to recognize the physical appearance of people. But we all have racism in our head. We all have prejudices, because we all have pattern-recognizing brains. The goal is simply to not succumb to these most basic thoughts, but make rational judgements instead.
I agree with the rest of your comment. The truly problematic aspect of racism is institutional racism. Where whole structures in society disadvantage certain skin colors, cultures etc. for their whole life. These institutions are obviously made up of individuals, so it's great, if each individual works on themselves, but we don't need all individuals to behave without even a single doubt of a flaw.
grin
in reply to Ephera • • •Yet even you don't think along these lines: the original post have neither stated nor implied anything about "races". You have seen pattern and thought about races, then shamed yourself and started to project your prejudices to others, and then shame them. But these are your thoughts: a lot of people [those who are not racist in the meaning of the word I believe in] do not think about "races" when talk about black, redhead, yellow, short, whatever people, they usually mean just that: different looking people.
There are very few real "racist" jokes; those you mean usually aren't in the general (non United States artificial PC-speech) sense.
What I said is: if you believe there are no races then you must not think of those races when seeing posts. And if the post states something about races then you do not need your imagination.
> But we all have racism in our head.
No, that is not true. We all have both associative and gr... show more
Yet even you don't think along these lines: the original post have neither stated nor implied anything about "races". You have seen pattern and thought about races, then shamed yourself and started to project your prejudices to others, and then shame them. But these are your thoughts: a lot of people [those who are not racist in the meaning of the word I believe in] do not think about "races" when talk about black, redhead, yellow, short, whatever people, they usually mean just that: different looking people.
There are very few real "racist" jokes; those you mean usually aren't in the general (non United States artificial PC-speech) sense.
What I said is: if you believe there are no races then you must not think of those races when seeing posts. And if the post states something about races then you do not need your imagination.
> But we all have racism in our head.
No, that is not true. We all have both associative and grouping/separation logic, that is right, but it does not imply malevolence. Racism requires hate and the feeling of supremacy. Simply recognising differences and applying them to everyday speech isn't racism, it's just accepting or using our differences.
> but make rational judgements instead
Oh how I wish! Like instead of PC-speech people would simply stop being malevolent, offensive, oversensitive, judgemental, and would recognise that saying "black person" is not racism and saying "those people who usually commit the crimes you know wink wink" is. [I cannot write good English examples since it's not my native tongue, I am sure there are racist phrases about black people not containing the word "black".]
> The truly problematic aspect of racism is institutional racism.
We agree on that. However I believe it is a huge problem when people start ACTING and SPEAKING like they are not racists while they are, and other people start "attacking" (or negatively commenting) people using various words despite not being racists and not being hateful. Like feminists who attack men, like "anti-fascists" who beat people -- these have just the opposite effect what originally should have been expected or desired.
PC-speech is bad the same way, and my mind explodes when a black person say "black person" and These People call him "racist". They bascially want to control how other people speak.
Ephera doesn't like this.
Memes reshared this.
Joe Bidet
in reply to grin • • •but discrimination starts way way earlier. when making "groups of people" based on things they didn't chose, and that actually shouldn't matter so much...
grin
in reply to Joe Bidet • • •You already said you're aware that the human mind (and in fact every mind on Earth) works by grouping and comparing, so your expectations are unrealistic.
For example you seem to be in the group of US people, also in the group of social justice warriors, also in men group, also in the group who uses alternative means for communication, also in various other groups (including the one containing persons who actually able to think and formulate good arguments). So am I a racist just because I form groups and collected you into them? I have various prejudices about these groups but I do not have hate, nor (significant
You can't have no groups. We call that what you're doing "pissing against the wind", and you know the result: you will change nothing but wetting yourself.
grin
in reply to Joe Bidet • • •Anders Rytter Hansen likes this.
Memes reshared this.
Ephera
in reply to Joe Bidet • • •Is your interpretation that it implies white should be with white, black with black, asian with asian?
like this
Anders Rytter Hansen, grin and SourPickle like this.
Arthur Besse doesn't like this.
Joe Bidet
in reply to Ephera • • •- the image is based on noticing these people's skin color in the first place, and making a joke out of them;
- the analogy with the Rubik's Cube means that there is something to "solve" there;
- the last click in the Rubik's Cube is a "perfect" state.
So this image, due to people's skin color, is one step away from a perfect state, where white people are with white people, black people with black people, etc... and should be "solved"?
How can this be read otherwise? (honest question)
Arthur Besse likes this.
Anders Rytter Hansen doesn't like this.
Ephera
in reply to Joe Bidet • • •Like, yeah, some people will read it the way that you did, but it's not like anyone will get convinced of skin color segregation from this meme. And while I don't exactly find the thought pleasant of some greasy racist feeling reassured by this shitty meme, it doesn't take the "haha, funny coincidence" away from me.
like this
Anders Rytter Hansen and grin like this.
grin
in reply to Joe Bidet • • •To me it was a joke about the skin colors, not about the people.
I can't even....
Yes, matching the patterns. I can't even see how it isn't obvious, like looking at a two triangles, cubes and rabbits and seeing matching rabbit-to-rabbit and triangle-to-triangle as "perfect state".
But maybe the solution is simpler: you don't understand jokes.
You seem to try to "explain" it and see "hidden content" in it, while it is, simply, a joke. With no such hidden or elusive meanings. Triangle-... show more
To me it was a joke about the skin colors, not about the people.
I can't even....
Yes, matching the patterns. I can't even see how it isn't obvious, like looking at a two triangles, cubes and rabbits and seeing matching rabbit-to-rabbit and triangle-to-triangle as "perfect state".
But maybe the solution is simpler: you don't understand jokes.
You seem to try to "explain" it and see "hidden content" in it, while it is, simply, a joke. With no such hidden or elusive meanings. Triangle-to-triangle, and recognising that every kind has its pair and it is "almost" "perfectly matched". That was a joke, and this all debate feels like when I was in school and the literature teacher wanted us to tell him that the poet wanted to say with the poem what he say he wanted. And I never have accepted that, and once I told him absolutely different things, and he got very angry and wanted to give me an "F" (or number 1 here around) and I told him (quite impolitely) that if he does that I will go to the director and request that he PROVE that the poet wanted to say THAT with the poem. I got nothing, was sent back to sit down (and I wasn't his favourite pupil anyway).
I born to be Politically Incorrect. And I still believe I'm a good person.
Fest
in reply to Joe Bidet • • •Joe Bidet likes this.
Memes reshared this.