Towards federated git collaboration
cross-postowane z: https://szmer.info/post/289222
Git was designed as a decentralized version control system from the ground up. Yet it has been subverted by centralizing hosting and collaboration platforms that compete on projects hosting their code on them. Disagreements on where a project should be hosted regularly result in flame wars. But why, since we live in a world of federated services? If the Git hosters would federate, it might not matter on which server a merge request or an issue is filed.
The #gitea issue targeted at adding #activitypub is still open, but it seems to require in-depth architectural changes. So what would be the best bet for a Git hosting platform to be the first in entering the #fediverse?
Design Discussion: ActivityPub support + ForgeFed vocabulary · Issue #14186 · go-gitea/gitea
#1612 discusses Federation in general but I wanted to open an issue for the ActivityPub + ForgeFed solution specifically and concretize this unit of work. Let's keep to discussing ActivityPub+F...GitHub
like this
hambone doesn't like this.
Anders Rytter Hansen
in reply to dreiwert • •like this
dreiwert, Muad'Dibber and Ekis like this.
Open Source reshared this.
smallcircles
in reply to Anders Rytter Hansen • • •I commented on the original post. Activity has shifted to Forgejo.
smallcircles
2023-03-04 09:32:20
like this
dreiwert and Krusty like this.
Open Source reshared this.
dreiwert
in reply to Anders Rytter Hansen • • •Btw, a similar effort for Gitlab: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab/-/issues/30672
Anders Rytter Hansen likes this.
Open Source reshared this.
Anders Rytter Hansen
in reply to dreiwert • •Open Source reshared this.
Ekis
in reply to dreiwert • • •like this
Ekis and dreiwert like this.